<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Brain Injury Lawyer FAQ&#187; Brain Injury Settlements and Verdicts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.braininjuryfaq.com/category/brain-injury-verdicts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.braininjuryfaq.com</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 10:41:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Martinez v. Kaiser Foundation Hospitals; CA (Arbitration &#8211; not filed)</title>
		<link>http://www.braininjuryfaq.com/martinez-v-kaiser-foundation-hospitals-ca-arbitration-not-filed/</link>
		<comments>http://www.braininjuryfaq.com/martinez-v-kaiser-foundation-hospitals-ca-arbitration-not-filed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 10:25:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Brain Injury Verdicts and Settlements]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.braininjuryfaq.com/?p=565</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
$9,600,000 arbitration award for three year old in medical malpractice claim
newborn&#8217;s blood sugar dropped to level low enough to cause brain damage in days after birth &#8211; failure to monitor and give supplemental feedings
bilateral occipital infarction on MRI consistent with severe hypoglycemia
infant cannot walk, crawl or use arms, legs or hands purposefully; cannot speak; experiences [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<ul>
<li>$9,600,000 arbitration award for three year old in medical malpractice claim</li>
<li>newborn&#8217;s blood sugar dropped to level low enough to cause brain damage in days after birth &#8211; failure to monitor and give supplemental feedings</li>
<li>bilateral occipital infarction on MRI consistent with severe hypoglycemia</li>
<li>infant cannot walk, crawl or use arms, legs or hands purposefully; cannot speak; experiences daily seizures</li>
<li>award includes $7,700,000 past and future (38 year life expectancy) medical costs, $1,400,000 future lost earnings, $250,000 general damages for infant and $250,000 non-economic damages for mother</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.braininjuryfaq.com/martinez-v-kaiser-foundation-hospitals-ca-arbitration-not-filed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Yao v. Thrasher; CA (Superior Court, San Mateo County; # 4766227)</title>
		<link>http://www.braininjuryfaq.com/yao-v-thrasher-ca-superior-court-san-mateo-county-4766227/</link>
		<comments>http://www.braininjuryfaq.com/yao-v-thrasher-ca-superior-court-san-mateo-county-4766227/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 10:13:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Brain Injury Verdicts and Settlements]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.braininjuryfaq.com/?p=561</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
$5,500,000 verdict in pedestrian knockdown motor vehicle accident case for 70 year old thrown 47 feet after impact
verdict included $1,5000,000 for past and future pain and suffering, $3,500,000 for past and future medical costs and $500,000 for wife&#8217;s loss of consortium claim
severe brain damage and tetraplegia, five level cervical vertebrae fusion
plaintiff is confined to bed [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<ul>
<li>$5,500,000 verdict in pedestrian knockdown motor vehicle accident case for 70 year old thrown 47 feet after impact</li>
<li>verdict included $1,5000,000 for past and future pain and suffering, $3,500,000 for past and future medical costs and $500,000 for wife&#8217;s loss of consortium claim</li>
<li>severe brain damage and tetraplegia, five level cervical vertebrae fusion</li>
<li>plaintiff is confined to bed for most of each day with limited mobility via wheelchair and requires round-the- clock care</li>
<li>jury apportioned liability 49% to defendant and 51% to plaintiff, with resulting reduction in above-noted verdict amounts</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.braininjuryfaq.com/yao-v-thrasher-ca-superior-court-san-mateo-county-4766227/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Smith v. All Children&#8217;s Hospital; FL (Pinellas County Circuit Court, 6th; # 01-005774-CI-07)</title>
		<link>http://www.braininjuryfaq.com/smith-v-all-childrens-hospital-fl-pinellas-county-circuit-court-6th-01-005774-ci-07/</link>
		<comments>http://www.braininjuryfaq.com/smith-v-all-childrens-hospital-fl-pinellas-county-circuit-court-6th-01-005774-ci-07/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 10:06:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Brain Injury Verdicts and Settlements]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.braininjuryfaq.com/?p=535</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
$11,500,000 jury verdict in medial malpractice case for three month old brought to emergency room suffering from vomiting and diarrhea
infant suffered shock and seizure brain damage after being treated and released instead of undergoing oral rehydration therapy
inability to walk, improper brain growth led to small head
inability to graduate high school, requirement of special education due [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<ul>
<li>$11,500,000 jury verdict in medial malpractice case for three month old brought to emergency room suffering from vomiting and diarrhea</li>
<li>infant suffered shock and seizure brain damage after being treated and released instead of undergoing oral rehydration therapy</li>
<li>inability to walk, improper brain growth led to small head</li>
<li>inability to graduate high school, requirement of special education due to memory problems and calculation difficulties</li>
<li>defense intends to pursue appeal</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.braininjuryfaq.com/smith-v-all-childrens-hospital-fl-pinellas-county-circuit-court-6th-01-005774-ci-07/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Russnak v. Nigalan; NJ (Atlantic County Superior Court; # ATL-L-17097-06)</title>
		<link>http://www.braininjuryfaq.com/russnak-v-nigalan-nj-atlantic-county-superior-court-atl-l-17097-06/</link>
		<comments>http://www.braininjuryfaq.com/russnak-v-nigalan-nj-atlantic-county-superior-court-atl-l-17097-06/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 10:15:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Brain Injury Verdicts and Settlements]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.braininjuryfaq.com/?p=538</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
$1,500,000 settlement in medical malpractice case
28 year old man presented to ER after playing in hockey game, complaining of inability to speak properly and facial drooping
plaintiff claimed tissue plasminogen activator (TPA) should gave been administered but defense contended that TPA was ill advised because plaintiff may have had bleeding in brain
injuries include right sided paralysis [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<ul>
<li>$1,500,000 settlement in medical malpractice case</li>
<li>28 year old man presented to ER after playing in hockey game, complaining of inability to speak properly and facial drooping</li>
<li>plaintiff claimed tissue plasminogen activator (TPA) should gave been administered but defense contended that TPA was ill advised because plaintiff may have had bleeding in brain</li>
<li>injuries include right sided paralysis and mild cognitive deficits</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.braininjuryfaq.com/russnak-v-nigalan-nj-atlantic-county-superior-court-atl-l-17097-06/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sadhwani v. New York City Transit Authority; NY (Appellate Division, 1st Dept.; # 116533/06)</title>
		<link>http://www.braininjuryfaq.com/sadhwani-v-new-york-city-transit-authority-ny-appellate-division-1st-dept-11653306/</link>
		<comments>http://www.braininjuryfaq.com/sadhwani-v-new-york-city-transit-authority-ny-appellate-division-1st-dept-11653306/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 17:45:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Brain Injury Verdicts and Settlements]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.braininjuryfaq.com/?p=528</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
$1,900,000 jury verdict affirmed for 75 year old homemaker struck by a bus
deterioration of cognitive functions resulted in inability to testify at trial
skull fracture with three week hospitalization and subsequent vestibular rehabilitation
residual injuries include dementia and Parkinson&#8217;s disease

]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<ul>
<li>$1,900,000 jury verdict affirmed for 75 year old homemaker struck by a bus</li>
<li>deterioration of cognitive functions resulted in inability to testify at trial</li>
<li>skull fracture with three week hospitalization and subsequent vestibular rehabilitation</li>
<li>residual injuries include dementia and Parkinson&#8217;s disease</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.braininjuryfaq.com/sadhwani-v-new-york-city-transit-authority-ny-appellate-division-1st-dept-11653306/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hutchinson v. Colindres; FL (Broward County Circuit Court; # CACE 96004960)</title>
		<link>http://www.braininjuryfaq.com/hutchinson-v-colindres-fl-broward-county-circuit-court-cace-96004960/</link>
		<comments>http://www.braininjuryfaq.com/hutchinson-v-colindres-fl-broward-county-circuit-court-cace-96004960/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 10:24:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Brain Injury Verdicts and Settlements]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.braininjuryfaq.com/?p=541</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
$4,340,000 jury verdict (including $3,500,000 for pain and suffering) for 15 year old student in medical malpractice case (delayed platelet transfusion at birth)
brain damage after suffering a stroke several days after birth
current injuries include visual field deficit, hearing problems and attention deficit disorder

]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<ul>
<li>$4,340,000 jury verdict (including $3,500,000 for pain and suffering) for 15 year old student in medical malpractice case (delayed platelet transfusion at birth)</li>
<li>brain damage after suffering a stroke several days after birth</li>
<li>current injuries include visual field deficit, hearing problems and attention deficit disorder</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.braininjuryfaq.com/hutchinson-v-colindres-fl-broward-county-circuit-court-cace-96004960/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bianchi v. Demma; CA (Superior Court, Santa Clara County; # 108 Civ. 104548)</title>
		<link>http://www.braininjuryfaq.com/bianchi-v-demma-ca-superior-court-santa-clara-county-108-civ-104548/</link>
		<comments>http://www.braininjuryfaq.com/bianchi-v-demma-ca-superior-court-santa-clara-county-108-civ-104548/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 09:57:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Brain Injury Verdicts and Settlements]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.braininjuryfaq.com/?p=531</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
$49,000,000 jury verdict for 21 year old pre-med college student in car accident (including $13,5000,000 for pain and suffering, $31,000,000 for medical costs and $4,500,000 for lost earnings)
severe closed head injury (diffuse bifrontal axonal injury and brain stem contusion, spastic quadriparesis, multiple skull fractures)
plaintiff will require lifetime round-the-clock nursing care

]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<ul>
<li>$49,000,000 jury verdict for 21 year old pre-med college student in car accident (including $13,5000,000 for pain and suffering, $31,000,000 for medical costs and $4,500,000 for lost earnings)</li>
<li>severe closed head injury (diffuse bifrontal axonal injury and brain stem contusion, spastic quadriparesis, multiple skull fractures)</li>
<li>plaintiff will require lifetime round-the-clock nursing care</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.braininjuryfaq.com/bianchi-v-demma-ca-superior-court-santa-clara-county-108-civ-104548/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ziadie v. Duong; FL (Broward County Circuit Court, 17th; # 062004 CA 003336)</title>
		<link>http://www.braininjuryfaq.com/ziadie-v-duong-fl-broward-county-circuit-court-17th-062004-ca-003336/</link>
		<comments>http://www.braininjuryfaq.com/ziadie-v-duong-fl-broward-county-circuit-court-17th-062004-ca-003336/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 10:30:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Brain Injury Verdicts and Settlements]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.braininjuryfaq.com/?p=544</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
$14,500,000 jury verdict (including $8,000,000 for pain and suffering and $5,000,000 for future medical care) in medical malpractice case
46 year old optometrist suffering from dizziness and slurred speech diagnosed with transient ischemic attacks underwent procedure to place stent in artery but stent punctured arterial wall
plaintiff was on large doses of blood thinners and blood pooled [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<ul>
<li>$14,500,000 jury verdict (including $8,000,000 for pain and suffering and $5,000,000 for future medical care) in medical malpractice case</li>
<li>46 year old optometrist suffering from dizziness and slurred speech diagnosed with transient ischemic attacks underwent procedure to place stent in artery but stent punctured arterial wall</li>
<li>plaintiff was on large doses of blood thinners and blood pooled around his brain</li>
<li>paralysis and trouble saying full sentences</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.braininjuryfaq.com/ziadie-v-duong-fl-broward-county-circuit-court-17th-062004-ca-003336/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Stanislav v. Papp; NY (Supreme Court, New York County; # 101049/08)</title>
		<link>http://www.braininjuryfaq.com/stanislav-v-papp-ny-supreme-court-new-york-county-10104908/</link>
		<comments>http://www.braininjuryfaq.com/stanislav-v-papp-ny-supreme-court-new-york-county-10104908/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 10:39:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Brain Injury Verdicts and Settlements]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.braininjuryfaq.com/?p=547</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
defense judgment after pre-trial motion decision by judge in case involving horseback riding fall
40 year old executive assistant fell to ground and hit head after horse suddenly and unexpectedly lunged forward
judge dismissed claim that new boyfriend bore any responsibility for failure to warn when he took plaintiff to stable owned by his friend
plaintiff sustained traumatic [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<ul>
<li>defense judgment after pre-trial motion decision by judge in case involving horseback riding fall</li>
<li>40 year old executive assistant fell to ground and hit head after horse suddenly and unexpectedly lunged forward</li>
<li>judge dismissed claim that new boyfriend bore any responsibility for failure to warn when he took plaintiff to stable owned by his friend</li>
<li>plaintiff sustained traumatic brain injury, underwent craniotomy and suffers from residual impairment of cognitive functions such as her memory and organizational ability</li>
<li>additional injuries include crippling migraines, post-traumatic stress disorder and seizure condition requiring medication and leaving her bedridden</li>
<li>plaintiff has filed a notice of appeal</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.braininjuryfaq.com/stanislav-v-papp-ny-supreme-court-new-york-county-10104908/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Haws v. County of Montgomery; CA (U.S. District Court, Northern Disttrict; # C-07-02599-JF)</title>
		<link>http://www.braininjuryfaq.com/haws-v-county-of-montgomery-ca-u-s-district-court-northern-disttrict-c-07-02599-jf/</link>
		<comments>http://www.braininjuryfaq.com/haws-v-county-of-montgomery-ca-u-s-district-court-northern-disttrict-c-07-02599-jf/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 17:18:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Brain Injury Verdicts and Settlements]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.braininjuryfaq.com/?p=517</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
$1,850,000 settlement for 47 year old prisoner assaulted while in pre-trial detention
brain damage with cognitive and behavioral impairment

]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<ul>
<li>$1,850,000 settlement for 47 year old prisoner assaulted while in pre-trial detention</li>
<li>brain damage with cognitive and behavioral impairment</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.braininjuryfaq.com/haws-v-county-of-montgomery-ca-u-s-district-court-northern-disttrict-c-07-02599-jf/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
